Engineering Code Reviewer

An AI reviewer that pre-screens every PR

Reviews pull requests for style, bugs, and security risks before a human engineer looks at them. Clear, actionable comments, not noise.

Capabilities

What your Code Reviewer worker does

01

Reviews PRs for code style, naming conventions, and linting issues

02

Flags potential bugs, security risks, and performance concerns

03

Checks for missing tests or incomplete error handling

04

Leaves clear, actionable comments directly on the PR

05

Tracks common issues across the team for coaching opportunities

06

Reduces time to first review for every PR

Goal example

"Pre-review every PR within 15 minutes. Catch 80%+ of style and lint issues before human review."

That's the entire setup. No prompts. No workflows.

Differentiators

What makes this different

15-minute first review

No more PRs sitting for hours waiting for someone to look. Your AI reviewer provides initial feedback within 15 minutes of opening, so authors can iterate immediately.

Signal, not noise

Your AI reviewer learns what your team considers important. Dismissed comments teach it what's noise. Over time, every comment becomes more relevant.

Security first

Hardcoded secrets, injection risks, authentication gaps, unvalidated inputs, your AI reviewer checks for security issues on every PR, not just when someone remembers to look.

Team-wide patterns

Weekly reports show the most common issues across all PRs. Use it to identify team coaching opportunities, update coding standards, or spot systematic problems.

Same team. Different output.

Before

  • PRs waiting hours for first review
  • Style issues caught during review, wasting senior engineer time
  • Security checks inconsistent, depends on the reviewer
  • No visibility into common code quality issues
  • Human reviewers spending time on mechanical checks

After

  • Every PR reviewed within 15 minutes
  • Style and lint issues caught before human review
  • Security scan on every PR automatically
  • Weekly report on common issues and trends
  • Human reviewers focus on architecture and logic

FAQ

Common questions

It pre-reviews every PR for code style, potential bugs, security risks, and test coverage. It leaves actionable comments on the PR within minutes, so human reviewers can focus on architecture and business logic.

No. It provides a first pass and flags issues. Approval and merge decisions are always made by human engineers. The AI reviewer reduces the surface area for human review, it doesn't replace it.

Yes. It starts with common best practices and adapts to your team's standards. When engineers dismiss comments, the AI learns what your team considers important vs. noise.

They gave you a tool. We'll give you a team.

Your first Shadow Worker is ready in 30 seconds. No contracts, no workflows to build, no AI to babysit.